MedHiveAddresses a key gap in healthcare AI: the inability to access diverse patient data due to privacy concerns. We aim to solve the that using A secure federated learning (FL) system
Medical research and machine learning models in healthcare have been historically limited by access to diverse patient data. Due to strict privacy concerns, hospitals cannot share raw patient data. This leads to biased models trained on limited populations. A Secure Federated Learning (FL) System that allows hospitals to collaboratively train machine learning models without exposing raw patient data. Hospitals upload their datasets, train models locally, and share encrypted model weights for collective learning.
A secure federated learning (FL) system where hospitals and research centers (data providers) train local models on sensitive patient data. The model weights are then encrypted and shared to build a robust, global model.
MedHive: Addresses a key gap in healthcare AI: the inability to access diverse patient data due to privacy concerns. As a result, traditional ML models are often biased because they’re trained on limited populations.
Issues | Problem | MedHive’s Solution |
---|---|---|
Bias in Medical AI Models | Most medical AI models are trained on limited and non-diverse datasets (often Western-centric or from specific institutions), leading to biased predictions. | By using federated learning, it allows institutions globally to train models locally on their data—without ever sharing raw patient data—creating truly representative global models. |
Data Privacy & Compliance (HIPAA, GDPR, etc.) | Patient data is highly sensitive, and regulations make it difficult to centralize datasets. | With federated learning and encrypted weight sharing, it ensures no sensitive data leaves its origin, making compliance much easier while still enabling collaborative learning. |
Access to AI for Underserved Medical Facilities | Smaller hospitals or clinics often don't have access to cutting-edge AI tools for diagnostics or analytics. | By offering a Model Hive, these institutions can access pretrained diagnostic models (hosted on HuggingFace), improving patient care in resource-constrained settings. |
Fragmentation in AI Development in Healthcare | Many institutions work in silos, leading to duplicated efforts and non-shareable insights. | It builds a centralized ecosystem (Model Hive) where models, learnings, and updates can be transparently accessed and improved—fostering collaboration and innovation. |
Lack of Interpretability and Monitoring in Medical AI | Clinicians and regulators demand visibility into how AI models perform and evolve. | Uses MLFlow integration for performance tracking and Admin Portal for transparency, version control, and decision-making around model deployment. |
Patient Outcomes & Early Diagnosis | Delayed or inaccurate diagnoses for conditions like breast cancer, glaucoma, or pneumonia can be fatal. | Delayed or inaccurate diagnoses for conditions like breast cancer, glaucoma, or pneumonia can be fatal. |
Feature / Parameter | MedHive | ABHA / ABDM (India) | NHS AI Lab (UK) | OpenMined / RADAR-base | Traditional Centralized AI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Core Purpose | Privacy-first AI model training & sharing | Unified health ID + data portability | AI diagnostics + NHS AI standards | Privacy-focused FL research | Model development from static datasets |
Privacy & Security | ✅ Federated learning, no raw data shared | ⚠️ Data centralized, protected under policy | ⚠️ Centralized but with NHS governance | ✅ Strong privacy via FL | ❌ High risk of data leakage |
Data Contribution | ✅ From hospitals + individual contributors | ❌ Only hospital/patient-linked records | ❌ NHS-only systems | ✅ Open to FL researchers | ❌ Requires full data sharing |
AI Diagnostic Models | ✅ Public model hub (e.g., ECG, Pneumonia) | ❌ Not AI-diagnostic focused | ⚠️ Research-stage models | ⚠️ Research-oriented demos | ✅ But often biased or inaccessible |
Compute Participation | ✅ Contributor model (anyone with resources) | ❌ No distributed compute support | ❌ Central compute only | ✅ FL testbeds | ❌ Monolithic infrastructure |
User Role Diversity | ✅ Admin, Data Provider, Contributor, User | ❌ Primarily patient + hospital roles | ❌ Internal system users | ✅ Flexible roles, but dev-focused | ❌ No role management |
Real-Time Model Monitoring | ✅ MLFlow-based model tracking | ❌ No AI performance metrics exposed | ⚠️ Possibly internal dashboards | ⚠️ Some visualizations | ❌ Black-box systems |
AI Assistant/Support | ✅ Groq LLM chatbot + FAISS RAG | ❌ Static dashboards & support | ❌ Limited LLM use | ⚠️ Technical, not UX-focused | ❌ No LLM guidance |
Target Impact Area | 🌍 Diagnostic equity via global AI | 🇮🇳 Health ID, records portability | 🇬🇧 NHS AI integration | 🌍 FL research testing | 🌍 Model building for select areas |
Openness/Extensibility | ✅ Open source + API-driven architecture | ❌ Mostly government-locked ecosystem | ❌ Closed-loop NHS systems | ✅ Open but niche | ❌ Hard to adapt/extensible |
Uses federated learning with encryption— so patients is privacy is never harmed.
Encourages trust among data providers who are traditionally reluctant to share patient data.
Focused on bridging diagnostic disparities by sourcing training from diverse global datasets.
Smaller clinics and research centers can contribute and benefit without owning massive compute power.
Hosted models on Hugging Face Spaces → public, easy to test, no setup required.
Includes high-impact models: ECG, Pneumonia, Breast Cancer, Glaucoma, and LLM-driven symptom analyzer.
Not just hospitals—anyone with idle compute can become a contributor.
Encourages open participation in AI training, democratizing research access.
Each FL cycle is logged in MLFlow, so models are not black boxes.
Admins have full access.
Domain | Technologies Used |
---|---|
Frontend Technologies | TypeScript, Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Backend Technologies | Python, FastAPI |
Databases | Supabase |
LLM Model APIs | Groq |
Frontend Hosting | Vercel |
Model Hive - Models | Huggingfaces Spaces |
Federated Learning | Flower |
Aggregated Learning | MLFlow |
Containerization | Docker |
Version Control | GitHub |
🔓 Limited Access for Exploration: Users can test a select set of models (e.g., LLM symptom checker or X-ray analyzer) with limited usage per month, perfect for students, patients, or small clinics exploring AI healthcare.
🧲 Onboarding Funnel: Acts as a gateway to upsell—by offering value upfront, we encourage users to upgrade for more advanced features and unlimited access.
🎛️ Full Model Access: Users get unlimited access to all MedHive models, with pricing based on API usage, compute time, or predictions made, ensuring flexibility for both individuals and institutions.
📈 Scalable Revenue Stream: As healthcare needs vary, this tier enables cost-efficient scaling, from a solo researcher to a multi-site clinic, without upfront subscription costs.
🔌 RESTful API Integration: Enterprises and healthtech companies can seamlessly integrate MedHive’s models into their own platforms via robust APIs, enabling custom workflows, automation, and analytics.
💸 Revenue Sharing & Contributor Rewards: A portion of enterprise revenue is shared with data providers and compute contributors, incentivizing continuous participation and creating a sustainable, collaborative ecosystem.
Visit the following link to explore the inner workings and Architecture of MedHive:
Day 1 – Kickoff, Infrastructure & Data Harmonization Kickoff & Alignment: Met with partner sites to confirm objectives, timelines, and compliance requirements. Environment Setup: Deployed FL servers, VPN tunnels, and data enclaves at Sites A & B; installed MedHive agents and validated connectivity. Data Mapping & ETL: Collected sample schemas (EHR, imaging); agreed on a common data dictionary; ran ETL pipelines and flagged missing fields for correction. Day 2 – Local Training, Federated Aggregation & Pilot Launch Baseline Model Deployment: Rolled out a CNN for pneumonia detection and an ECG classifier; executed first local training rounds, logging metrics in MLflow. Secure Aggregation: Conducted federated averaging with encrypted weight updates; resolved an SSL misconfiguration and re‑ran the aggregation. Monitoring & Interpretability: Integrated TensorBoard and SHAP dashboards into MLflow; shared drift and feature‐importance insights with clinical leads. Clinician Feedback & Iteration: Demo’d predictions to radiologists/cardiologists, incorporated feedback on false positives, updated hyperparameters, and retrained. Pilot Launch: Released MedHive v0.1 to a pilot user group at Site A; collected initial usage logs—no critical errors reported—and scheduled a Week 2 workshop to onboard Sites C/D.
None